![]() ![]() ![]() “In general, the board oversees district-wide issues and policies. Public comment is available for those who attend the meeting in person. Public comment is limited to three minutes. Public participants must be residents of the District or Lakota staff, and have a legitimate interest in the action of the Board. “ We welcome comments and questions at Board Meetings during our public participation section of the agenda. The district website has guidelines for public speakers: Our facilitator will lead both small and large group discussions around communicating with one another with respect and civility in a divisive time,” the website states. “Join us for our first community conversation of the school year on Monday, Oct. Oswald’s attorney said it was too soon in the process to comment. The Board will defend decisions it believes to be in the best interest of the Lakota community.” There is nothing unlawful about the Lakota Local School Board’s regulation of public participation at its meetings. Unlike other districts, Lakota actually provides two different opportunities for public comment at its meetings. Like all school districts, the Board has a policy that sets forth rules that must be met in order for District residents to speak. “The Board invites and welcomes public comment from the Lakota community. But the Board’s top priority has been, and will always be, the safety of Lakota students and staff. ![]() Understandably, this has led to significant and, at times, heated debates in communities. “The COVID-19 pandemic has forced districts across the country to make difficult decisions as students return to the classroom. The allegations in the complaint are a gross mischaracterization of what actually happened at the September 27 board meeting and they will be dealt with accordingly in court. “Our attorneys are currently reviewing a lawsuit filed by a Lakota parent against the Board of Education. Any other actual damages or equitable relief the court deems fit under the circumstance.Injunctive relief enjoining the school board from placing unbridled discretion in the presiding officer to restrain speech based upon its overbroad, vague, and content-based rules.Injunctive relief precluding the school board from restraining Oswald’s speech and offices and from otherwise denying his right to contact, petition, and access its officials or school employees.A declaration that the school board’s actions constitute a violation of his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.In addition to the $500,000, Oswald is seeking: The Butler County Sheriff’s Office launched an internal affairs investigation into Oswald based upon the false accusations of the School Board.” “On September 29, 2021, Oswald was made aware from his employer, the Butler County Sheriff’s Office, that a formal complaint had been filed against him by the School District for his conduct during the September 27, 2021, School Board meeting. His suit seeks a court order prohibiting the school board from allegedly violating others’ rights $500,000 in damages, attorneys fees and court costs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |